Tuesday 19 July 2011 11:33:54 pm
By : Tomasz Janukowicz
For many years, eZ publish was good out of box solution. Since many months, I can see more often, that is easier and faster to write something similiar using alternative technologies. Rails, tornadoweb, chery.py, django are more on time.
Last aricles I red: mobile app by Luksza Serwatka, and Daniel Oien on Ngnix shows, that eZ publish is close dead end.
First article showed real world: no plugin, no extension, no "development" ne website.
Second, lightweight technologies is the future of web.
Sine over two years, I'm asking same question: is it worth all effort to stay with php or just move all good achievments to more eficient technology / language.
Has anybody same thoughts?
Timing: | Jan 18 2025 02:06:27 |
Script start | |
Timing: | Jan 18 2025 02:06:27 |
Module start 'layout' | |
Timing: | Jan 18 2025 02:06:27 |
Module start 'content' | |
Timing: | Jan 18 2025 02:06:27 |
Module end 'content' | |
Timing: | Jan 18 2025 02:06:27 |
Script end |
Total runtime | 0.0758 sec |
Peak memory usage | 6,144.0000 KB |
Database Queries | 39 |
Checkpoint | Start (sec) | Duration (sec) | Memory at start (KB) | Memory used (KB) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Script start | 0.0000 | 0.0063 | 587.9141 | 152.6250 |
Module start 'layout' | 0.0063 | 0.0033 | 740.5391 | 39.4531 |
Module start 'content' | 0.0096 | 0.0649 | 779.9922 | 344.1406 |
Module end 'content' | 0.0745 | 0.0012 | 1,124.1328 | 10.3984 |
Script end | 0.0757 | 1,134.5313 |
Accumulator | Duration (sec) | Duration (%) | Count | Average (sec) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ini load | ||||
Load cache | 0.0030 | 3.9796 | 15 | 0.0002 |
Check MTime | 0.0012 | 1.6314 | 15 | 0.0001 |
Mysql Total | ||||
Database connection | 0.0012 | 1.6047 | 1 | 0.0012 |
Mysqli_queries | 0.0358 | 47.1948 | 39 | 0.0009 |
Looping result | 0.0003 | 0.3543 | 36 | 0.0000 |
Template Total | 0.0421 | 55.5 | 2 | 0.0210 |
Template load | 0.0021 | 2.7648 | 2 | 0.0010 |
Template processing | 0.0400 | 52.7228 | 2 | 0.0200 |
Template load and register function | 0.0001 | 0.1400 | 1 | 0.0001 |
states | ||||
state_id_array | 0.0015 | 1.9851 | 1 | 0.0015 |
state_identifier_array | 0.0017 | 2.2434 | 2 | 0.0008 |
Override | ||||
Cache load | 0.0017 | 2.2796 | 10 | 0.0002 |
Sytem overhead | ||||
Fetch class attribute name | 0.0014 | 1.8539 | 2 | 0.0007 |
class_abstraction | ||||
Instantiating content class attribute | 0.0000 | 0.0069 | 2 | 0.0000 |
General | ||||
dbfile | 0.0014 | 1.8769 | 10 | 0.0001 |
String conversion | 0.0000 | 0.0120 | 4 | 0.0000 |
Note: percentages do not add up to 100% because some accumulators overlap |
Usage | Requested template | Template | Template loaded | Edit | Override |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | node/view/full.tpl | blog_entry/full.tpl | extension/community_design/design/suncana/override/templates/blog_entry/full.tpl | ||
2 | content/datatype/view/ezxmltext.tpl | <No override> | extension/community_design/design/suncana/templates/content/datatype/view/ezxmltext.tpl | ||
2 | content/datatype/view/ezxmltags/paragraph.tpl | <No override> | extension/ezwebin/design/ezwebin/templates/content/datatype/view/ezxmltags/paragraph.tpl | ||
1 | print_pagelayout.tpl | <No override> | extension/community/design/community/templates/print_pagelayout.tpl | ||
Number of times templates used: 6 Number of unique templates used: 4 |
Time used to render debug report: 0.0001 secs