svn branches

Next topic

Author	Message
Paul Forsyth	Friday 11 April 2003 2:59:18 am Looking at the source in svn we can see that a branch has been created. Does this mean that a 3.0.2 is imminent? Its hard to see from the logs since that branch is not public on the server. The only svn logs available are from the trunk and of course the logs for the missing revisions can't be seen :( We are wondering if 3.0.2 will contain the workflow fixes we require. Thanks Paul
Jan Borsodi	Friday 11 April 2003 4:06:02 am The 3.0 branch is public, you view it here: http://zev.ez.no/svn/nextgen/stable/3.0/ What workflow fixes are referring to? -- Amos Documentation: http://ez.no/ez_publish/documentation FAQ: http://ez.no/ez_publish/documentation/faq
Paul Forsyth	Friday 11 April 2003 5:57:42 am ah. i didn't realise that directory was the branch. thanks! In the thread: http://ez.no/developer/ez_publish_3/forum/developer/forums_and_workflow we encountered a redirect issue with workflows. we were speculating that maybe fixes would be in the stable branch if this is indeed the real problem. paul

Author

Message

Friday 11 April 2003 2:59:18 am

Looking at the source in svn we can see that a branch has been created. Does this mean that a 3.0.2 is imminent?

Its hard to see from the logs since that branch is not public on the server. The only svn logs available are from the trunk and of course the logs for the missing revisions can't be seen :( We are wondering if 3.0.2 will contain the workflow fixes we require.

Thanks

Paul

Jan Borsodi

Friday 11 April 2003 4:06:02 am

The 3.0 branch is public, you view it here:
http://zev.ez.no/svn/nextgen/stable/3.0/

What workflow fixes are referring to?

--
Amos

Documentation: http://ez.no/ez_publish/documentation
FAQ: http://ez.no/ez_publish/documentation/faq

Paul Forsyth

Friday 11 April 2003 5:57:42 am

ah. i didn't realise that directory was the branch. thanks!

In the thread:

http://ez.no/developer/ez_publish_3/forum/developer/forums_and_workflow

we encountered a redirect issue with workflows. we were speculating that maybe fixes would be in the stable branch if this is indeed the real problem.

paul